AI Gigs is an independent digital publication based in London, United Kingdom. We cover AI tools, freelancing strategies and workflow automation — without hype, without affiliate spin, without fake promises.
We started AI Gigs because most content about "making money with AI" fell into two unhelpful categories: either breathlessly optimistic hype, or cynical dismissal. Neither is useful to someone genuinely trying to understand what's possible.
Our goal is to be the publication we wished existed: one that treats readers as intelligent adults, acknowledges what AI tools genuinely can and cannot do, and presents information that's actually actionable rather than aspirational.
We write for freelancers, remote workers, students, creators and anyone who wants to use AI tools more effectively in their professional life.
Honest assessments of AI tools, including limitations and who they're actually for.
Practical guides on building AI workflows, finding clients and positioning skills.
Grounded looks at which AI services are in demand and why.
The less-discussed human side of integrating AI into professional work.
Technology journalist with 7 years covering digital media, productivity tools and the future of work. Based in London.
Former software engineer turned tech writer. Covers workflow automation, AI APIs and tools for technical and non-technical users alike.
Freelance strategist and coach who has worked with independent professionals in 12 countries. Writes about the business side of creative work.
We would rather publish fewer, more accurate articles than chase traffic with misleading headlines or inflated claims.
We disclose when content involves affiliate relationships, when AI tools assisted in editing, and when our knowledge has limits.
We never publish income claims without appropriate context. AI tools are productivity enhancers, not passive income machines.
No dark patterns, no fake countdown timers, no urgency manipulation. The site exists to be useful, not to extract clicks.
Tools and services are covered because they are editorially relevant, not because companies paid for coverage.